The GeForce FX 5200 & 5600 Debut!
The NV34 and NV31 Officially Unveiled

By - Marco Chiappetta
March 6, 2003

 
To showcase the in-game rendering capabilities of the new GeForce FX GPUs, NVIDIA provided screenshots from a few current, and soon to be released games.  These screenshots are intended to show the benefits of the GeForce FX's 128-Bit Floating Point color precision and to demonstrate the increased geometry processing power of these new GPUs... 

Some In-Game Screenshots
Impressive Visuals
 
COMMAND & CONQUER: GENERALS
EA - WESTWOOD STUDIOS
 
 
TOM CLANCY'S SPLINTER CELL
UBI SOFT ENTERTAINMENT
 
 
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. - OBLIVION LOST
GSC GAME WORLD
 
 
UNREAL 2: THE AWAKENING
EPIC GAMES
 

Please keep in mind that the pictures posted above are compressed JPEGs, so there is some loss in image quality.  Even with the inherent disadvantages of compressed JPEGs, there is no denying these images are fantastic.  The increased polygon counts used in the models and environments, the realistic lighting effects, the bump mapping and the realistic shadows make for some of the best looking gaming to date.

Preliminary Performance Information
Numbers Provided By NVIDIA

All this talk of features is great, but if a given product doesn't perform well, the feature set is all for naught.  We do not have final GeForce FX 5200 or 5600 Ultra boards in our possession as of yet but NVIDIA did provide some graphs that demonstrate the NV31's and NV34's relative performance, versus the competition in a few popular benchmarks.


BENCHMARKS PROVIDED BY NVIDIA

We are not going to elaborate on these graphs much because we were not present for the testing and had no control over the test system.  With that said however, according to this information, NVIDIA is enjoying performance levels with the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra that are roughly 1.5x to 2x that of the Radeon 9500, when Antialiasing is enabled at a resolution of 1280x1024.  But what about the 5200s?


BENCHMARKS PROVIDED BY NVIDIA

The GeForce FX 5200, again according to the NVIDIA provided benchmarks, is performing much higher than the current generation of products it is meant to replace.  When compared to an ATi Radeon 9000 Pro, at a resolution of 1280x1024 with 2x AA enabled, the GeForce FX 5200 is outperforming the Radeon by over 250% in UT2003.  When compared to the GeForce 4 MX 440, NVIDIA is claiming similar performance advantages.  We are eager to get production boards in our hands, because if these numbers hold true in independent testing, NVIDIA is going to have a couple of winning products on their hands...again.

So, where do the GeForce FX 5200, 5200 Ultra and 5600 Ultra fit in the very competitive mainstream video card market?  Well, if the performance levels NVIDIA is claiming hold true, the NV31 and NV34 based products are positioned very well.  At an MSRP of less than $200, the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra should be a big seller for NVIDIA.  This card has all of the features you'll need moving forward, with performance levels that rival competing products at the same price points.  The same can be said about the GeForce FX 5200 and 5200 Ultra.  At $99 and $149 respectively, NVIDIA will have some of the most feature-rich products for the money.  Take a look at the complete price breakdown... 

NVIDIA should be commended for bringing a true DirectX 9 part to the sub-$100 segment.  If the performance is competitive, and it should be, we think the GeForce FX 5200 is going to find its way into a slew of "boxed" PCs built by some of the larger OEMs, and budget gamers are going to gobble them up post haste.  There are two hurdles NVIDIA must overcome though.  First is availability.  NVIDIA told us, boards based on the NV31 and NV34 should be available in April.  Historically, we'd take NVIDIA at their word, but we're having a tough time swallowing the April release date based on our experience, or lack thereof, with the NV30.  The second hurdle was announced about 13 hours ago, ATi's new Radeon 9600 and 9200 boards.  ATi claims the new Radeons significantly outperform their "older" counterparts, and they are priced between $129 and $200.  Until all of these products are available, and compared to each other, we obviously can't declare one product superior to the other.  What we will say is that now is a great time to be gamer, we have never had as many viable choices as we do today.

 

Discuss This Article in HotHardware's PC Hardware Forum, Now!