Epox 4PDA2+ V2 Motherboard Review
One Step Closer to Near-Perfection

"Burned" in by Robert Maloney
September 3, 2003

How We Configured Our Test Systems:

To help fully explain the scores we listed in the following benchmarks, we felt it was necessary to explain how the systems were set up before running the benchmarks. Our normal practice is to start off by manually optimizing the BIOS settings to the most aggressive system options available to us.  This meant that on each of the boards, the memory frequency was manually set to DDR400 with the CAS timings set to 2-5-2-2.  Since each of these Springdale-based boards came with some form of memory enhancement, we opted to enable this as well, which was set to the most aggressive option available.

Once the BIOS options were set, the hard drive was formatted as a FAT32 partition, and Windows XP Professional with Service Pack 1 was installed. After the Windows installation completed, we installed the latest Intel chipset drivers and upgraded to DirectX 9.0a.  We then installed the drivers for the rest of the components, using drivers supplied on each manufacturer's CD, except for the Tyan Tachyon G9500 Pro video card.  For the G9500, we installed the latest (at the time of testing) ATi Catalyst drivers, version 3.4.  Auto-Updating, Hibernation, and System Restore were disabled, and then we set up a 768MB permanent page file. On these test systems we set the visual effects to "best performance" in system performance to limit any effects these settings would have on the benchmarks.   Satisfied that every thing was set up correctly, we installed all of the benchmarking software, defragged the hard drive, and rebooted one last time. 

HotHardware Test Setup
Can the 4PDA2+ come out to play?

Motherboards Tested:
Epox 4PDA2+ Version 2.0 (Intel 865PE)
Abit IS7-G (Intel 865PE)
Albatron 865PE Pro-II (Intel 865PE)

Asus P4P800 Deluxe (Intel 865PE)

Common Hardware:
Intel Pentium 4 Processor 2.40C 2.4GHz / 800MHz System Bus
512MB (256MB x2) GEIL DDR433 SDRAM (2-5-2-2)
Tyan Tachyon G9500 Pro
Western Digital 20GB ATA100 Hard Drive
52x Creative Labs CD-ROM

Software / System Drivers:
Windows XP with Service Pack 1
DirectX 9.0a
ATi Catalyst Drivers, v3.4
Intel Chipset Software, v5.00.1012
 

SiSoft Sandra Benchmarks
Synthetic testing

SANDRA (the System ANalyzer, Diagnostic and Reporting Assistant) is an information and diagnostic utility put out by the folks at SiSoftware.  It's a quick and easy way to compare the CPU, Memory, and Hard drive performance of a given system against an internal database of similar systems and drives. These benchmarks are theoretical scores, and can't necessarily be measured in real-world terms, but provide a good way to make comparisons amongst like components.  All of these tests were run with our CPU set to its default clock speed (~2.40GHz / 12 x 200MHz).


( ALU MEASURED IN MIPS / FPU MEASURED IN MFLOPS )


( MEASURED IN IT/S )


( MEASURED IN MB/S )

If anything, these three tests seem to be a "push" - that is, it's hard to claim a true winner when the scores are so close together.  The CPU performance graph is the closest grouping of the three with the Epox 4PDA2+ V2 taking the slimmest of leads in the ALU test and slightly behind in FPU.  The "stock" speed of the board, as shown in WCPUID, was a robust 201.44MHz, which partially helps account for the high numbers, although none of the boards actually clocked in at an even 200MHz.  In the Multimedia module, the Epox 4PDA2+ V2 takes the number two slot in both measurements, behind the Asus P4P800 Deluxe in Integer Point calculations and the Abit IS7-G in Floating Point.  The test we were most curious to see what the Memory Performance Module.  It was here that we saw the major differences between the boards in our Springdale Showdown.  While all of the boards in this review have a PAT-like enhancement, it remained to be seen how well it worked.  Well, the verdict is that Epox's engineers have done a great job, with memory scores rivaling that of Abit's renowned "Game Accelerator Technology" (GAT). 

Winstones and PCMark2002 Benchmarks