
 |
Benchmarking with Sisoft Sandra 2002 Pro |
Starting with the Synthetic... |
|
SiSoft Sandra
2002 Professional is an excellent utility for gauging a
systems capabilities when compared to a large internal
database. We ran the scores at both the default bus
speed of 133MHz. and the overclocked rate of 140MHz.
CPU@1.53GHz.
.jpg) |
CPU@1.61GHz.
.jpg) |
Multimedia@1.53GHz.
.jpg) |
Multimedia@1.61GHz.
.jpg) |
There isn't much
to say here. The CPU scores were right on-par with
what we would expect from an AthlonXP 1800+ processor.
Once we overclocked the system, the processor's scores
increased nicely, taking a firm lead over each of the
comparison processors.
Memory@1.53GHz.
.jpg) |
Memory@1.61GHz.
.jpg) |
The memory
scores were decent, performing slightly better than the
PC2100 KT266A reference system. Once we clocked the
bus to 140MHz. the scores increased fairly well, surpassing
the Intel 845 reference system with PC2100, although the
Intel 850 system with RDRAM still held a firm lead over all
systems.
Hard Drive - RAID
.jpg) |
The hard drive
scores with the Promise RAID controller were slightly below
the reference system, but respectable nonetheless.
Now synthetic benchmarks are
fine-and-dandy for giving you an idea of a systems
potential, but the real test is when we start making the
board earn its scores. So let's get to it and start
cranking out the numbers!
 |
Benchmarks
and Comparisons |
The CPU Test |
|
One of the first tests we like
to run on a motherboard is the Quake3 Timedemo "DEMO001" at
640x480 with all textures set to their lowest settings.
This allows us to test the raw CPU power of the system by
reducing any possible load on the video card. In this
test and all the others, the scores were compared to two new
KT333 based systems, the MSI KT3 Ultra ARU and the Shuttle
AK35GT2/R. We do this for a frame of reference to show
how the system compares to other popular systems.
Quake 3:

Well now, it looks like the
KT266A isn't ready to retire yet. The DFI AD73 took
charge of the CPU test, pumping out an excellent 260FPS.
The MSI came in a very close second (256) while the Shuttle
board brought up the rear with 253FPS. So when it
comes to pure CPU load, the DFI board had the edge, but does
it mean that it will take it to the KT333 in all the tests?
Let's take a look.
Our next round of tests is the
newcomer to the testing world, PCMark2002. Unlike
3DMark2001SE, PCmark2002 is a full system benchmarking
program that tests all areas of a computer system in one
easy to use program. PCMark2002 rounds out the tests
with 3 scores, CPU, Memory and HDD. Let's take a look
and see if the KT266A board could still hold its own with
the new kids on the block.
PCMark2002 "CPU":

Once again, the DFI system had
the highest score in this test, although the gap between the
three systems is much narrower. Next is the "Memory"
score.
PCMark2002 "Memory":

Here is where the MSI board
shines, with a solid lead over the DFI and Shuttle systems.
Surprisingly, the DFI came in second over the Shuttle
system.
Next we'll take a look at the
hard drive performance of all three systems.
More PCMark2002, The Winstones
& 3DMark2001SE |