The Chaintech 7VJL Motherboard Review
KT333 and Gold, Lots of Gold

By -Chris Angelini
August 2nd, 2002

HotHardware Test Systems
KT333 Test Beds

 

Chaintech 7VJL KT333 Motherboard

512MB Corsair PC2700 DDR SDRAM

 

MSI KT3 Ultra-ARU

512MB Corsair PC2700 DDR SDRAM

 

ABIT KX7-333

512MB Corsair PC2700 DDR SDRAM

 

Common Hardware:

AMD Athlon XP 2100+

NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4600 (v.29.42)

IBM 30GB ATA-100 7200RPM Hard Drive

Sound Blaster Live! Value

A Few Words About The Benchmarks:
In setting up our test machines, we install Windows XP on a formatted, FAT32 hard drive.  After installing the relevant drivers we disable system restore, all of the graphical enhancements in Windows XP, and the Automatic Update feature.  The desktop on each test bed is set to 1024x768, 16-bit color and a 75Hz refresh rate.

Additionally, all three motherboards are outfitted with the latest BIOS image files publicly available from each manufacturer.

 
Benchmarking with SiSoft Sandra 2002
Very Similar Performance...

As a synthetic benchmark, it would be expected that Sandra would be able to expose any weaknesses in the KT333 platforms.  Each board performs very well though, making it difficult to predict a winner.  The 7VJL is clearly able to utilize more memory bandwidth than the other boards, which may come into play with applications like Quake III or Content Creation Winstone 2002. 

Quake III: Arena
The True Test: Gaming

The original Demo001 makes a great processor benchmark, so we ran each board through a timed demo at 640x480 to ensure the powerful GeForce4 Ti 4600 has plenty of steam left to burn.  The result is that the processor becomes the bottleneck and a good basis for comparison is established.  Remarkably, the 7VJL is able to put an obvious distance (seven percent!) between itself and the competing KT333 boards. 

3D Mark 2001 SE
A Discernable Difference, Again

Using the latest build of 3D Mark 2001 SE it can again be seen that the 7VJL clearly outperforms the other two machines.  We could devise endless hypotheses to explain the difference - aggressive memory timings, the integration of the new VIA South Bridge or some other unseen advantage.  Let's think about this some more...

CCWS 2002, BWS 2001 and Conclusion