Intel's Pentium 4 3GHz With 800MHz System Bus
And The i875P "Canterwood" Chipset
More bandwidth and leading edge desktop technology for the P4

By, Dave Altavilla
and Chris Angelini
April 14, 2003
 

 
First we'll give you a quick take on the Sandra numbers of the P4 3G-800 on the Canterwood and compare them to a 3.06-533 CPU on a Granite Bay board.  We also give you a taste of SATA 150 Intel style, as well as RAID 0 wholesome goodness.

Pentium 4 3.0GHz SiSoft Sandra Testing
Canterwood vrs. Granite Bay - 3G/800 vrs. 3.06G/533

 

CPU 3G CW

CPU 3.06G GB


MM 3G CW

 
MM 3.06G GB


Mem Dual DDR400
Canterwood


Mem Dual DDR266
Granite Bay


SATA150 HD Test

 
SATA150 RAID 0

Things scale pretty much on target here, with respect to the CPU and Multimedia numbers.  We have to remember that, although this new P4 is cranking along on a System bus that is nearly 300MHz faster than its older sibling, it is running about 60MHz slower, since it has an even 3GHz (versus 3.06GHz) clock speed.  This new 3GHz Northwood has a 15X multiplier and a 200MHz Front Side Bus.  The older 3.06GHz P4 has a 23X multiplier and a 133MHz Front Side Bus.  You can do the math from here but there are slightly fewer clock cycles, at stock speed, with this new chip.  However, as you'll see later, this has zero effect on real-world performance and the new 800MHz System Bus really takes this new P4 over the top.

The Memory Test however, shows not only the benefits of DDR400 but the obvious strength of pairing it with that 800MHz System Bus as well.  Here we see the new P4 and Canterwood, along with good DDR400 memory, putting the hurt on anything that you could configure with RDRAM.  This could be the proverbial nail in the coffin for the controversial memory technology.

Finally, we took one of our Maxtor DiamondMax SATA drives out for a spin, to show you what SATA 150 and a SATA 150 RAID 0 array could do.  Intel's numbers are on pace with the lead dog in the SATA controller race right now, Silicon Image.  We'll dig deeper into SATA testing toward the end of this article.

Overclocking The 3GHz P4 - Intel "Burn In" Mode
Overclocking an Intel board?  You betcha...

CPU 3.120GHz OC
   

MM 3.120GHz OC
   
418MHz Dual DDR

While these overclocked speeds are nothing to write home about, we thought it made sense to show you what this new D875PBZ Canterwood board from Intel could do.  This speed was achieved at stock voltage, since the BIOS does not allow for voltage adjustments of any kind.  Regardless, it's impressive to see what Dual DDR at 418MHz can do with an 836MHz FSB. Nearly 5000MB/sec of integer and floating point bandwidth, imagine what an Abit, Asus or MSI overclocking ready board will do.

Winstone Benchmarks
Business Application and Content Creation Performance

Applications used in the Business Winstone tests include:

  • Five Microsoft Office 2002 applications (Access, Excel, FrontPage, PowerPoint, and Word)
  • Microsoft Project 2000
  • Lotus Notes
  • WinZip 8.0
  • Norton AntiVirus
  • Netscape Communicator

The Business Winstone tests are an excellent way to get a feel for how responsive your system will feel in everyday desktop use.  The Intel D875PBZ is represented in this chart with the "Canter" abbreviation and the Granite Bay Board is noted with "GB".  AMD's Athlon XP 3000+ still holds the lead here by a slight edge, due in part to its efficiency with legacy code.  The rest of the field leans toward the Canterwood based D875PBZ configurations.  However, you'll note that Hyperthreading actually hinders the top end scores ever so slightly in this test, with 2.8GHz setups barely outpacing the 3.06GHz systems.  Lastly, the P4 3GHz, with 800MHz Sys Bus, puts up the best Biz Winstone score for a P4 we have seen to date.

 

Applications used in the Content Creation Winstone tests include:

  • Adobe Photoshop 6.0.1

  • Adobe Premiere 6.0

  • Macromedia Director 8.5

  • Macromedia Dreamweaver UltraDev 4

  • Microsoft Windows Media Encoder 7.01.00.3055

  • Netscape Navigator 6/6.01

  • Sonic Foundry Sound Forge 5.0c (build 184)


The Content Creation Winstone 2002 test yields more of the same really, with regard to the P4 scores.  However, CC Winstone and the applications it runs clearly favor the Athlon here by a wider margin than in the Business Winstone test.  Take a good look at this chart.  It's the last time you'll see the Athlon XP 3000+ lead in this article. 

On a side note, although Content Creation Winstone 2003 is available, we have yet to get that benchmark to run stable across a number of platforms.  As such, we are unable to include it in our test suite at this time.  We are hopeful that VeriTest will rectify the issues they are having with the well known Lightwave crash issue they are having.

 

Video Encoding With XMPEG And PCMark 2002