Abit IC7-G vs. Asus P4C800
A tale of two Canterwoods

By, Dave Altavilla
April 29, 2003

 

Asus also took a seemingly well rounded chipset, like the i875P and tricked things out a bit more.  The P4C800 we tested is the "Deluxe" edition and as such, Asus aimed high with extra features and integration.

Up Close and Personal With The Asus P4C800
Canterwood  with Asus attitude

Click images for full view
   

   

 

The board itself, like the Abit board, is a pleasure to behold (at least if you're the PC-Geek type like us here) and the layout is also immaculate.  Like the IC7-G, the P4C800 also has its power connectors at the edge of the backside of the PCB, out of the way of the CPU socket and chipset heat-sink.  Asus went with a very large and sturdy aluminum sink on the Northbridge and it does an excellent job of conducting heat away from the i875P chip underneath.  If only there was a small fan attached to the top, this solution would have been perfect.  But alas, there aren't many things in life that are perfect however, and we do prefer this sink assembly slightly more than the IC7-G's rather smallish HSF.  Asus also dropped in an additional SATA RAID controller but decided to work with the Promise/Marvell PDC20378 chip.  We prefer the Silicon Image chip used on the Abit board, for its slight performance advantage but this is pretty much a toss up.  The Promise chip also does offer support for an extra ATA133 channel on this board, for a total of 3 ATA100/133 channels, including the two off of the ICH5 Southbridge.

The P4C800 GigE LAN solution is driven by the 3Com/Marvell controller.  We're not sure how this technology plays in with Intel's "CSA" interface for the i875P but we assume, they've licensed the bus technology out versus this sitting on the PCI bus.  We need to confirm this but it wouldn't make sense to go with a third party chip like this, unless it could take advantage of this key architectural feature for the i875P chipset.  We didn't specifically test the performance of the LAN interfaces on these boards but the 3Com solution here performed very well and was pretty snappy over a 100Mb connection.  Asus also offers a rear channel output with their ADI SoundMax 6 channel audio solution but used an interesting RCA jack instead and there is no SPDIF jack or back-plate included.  Finally, the P4C800 bundle is surprisingly skimpy, when you consider this is a "Deluxe" version package that we tested.  Asus only offered 2 SATA cables, two standard ATA cables, a back trim plate and a driver/utilities CD, in addition to the User's and "Getting Started" manuals.  There are no SATA Power cables and no additional USB2.0 connector plates, like were included with the Abit bundle.  In short, the on board features of the P4C800 are certainly "deluxe" but the bundle is "economy".

Asus P4C800 BIOS Setup
AMI, unfortunately

Click images for full view
 

 

 

When we first fired up the P4C800, our graphics card was not synching up with our 20" Dell flat panel, that we use for testing.  The screen would flicker in and out, and although the image was there, it wouldn't hold a synch lock long enough for us to navigate the BIOS menus, when driven through a standard VGA input.  The only mode that worked correctly was with DVI on the flat panel...and then it dawned on us.  This board uses an AMI BIOS that sends a weird 56Hz frequency request to the VGA card that a few flat panel monitors may have an issue with, since it is below the standard 60Hz frequency for LCD displays.  Why Asus elected to go with an AMI BIOS instead of the industry default Award BIOS, is beyond us.  Once we figured out what the problem was with respect to the VGA input on our flat panel, we switched to DVI and everything worked well.  However, some users may or may not struggle with this.

Other than that, the BIOS options are plentiful with this AMI setup.  You can adjust CPU, Memory and AGP bus speeds, as well as set voltages for each.  However, the board only allows up to a 1.7V CPU core voltage, 1.6V with a funky +.1V "offset" feature.  Then there are the usual DRAM timing control settings, except this BIOS also allows adjustment of DRAM burst length as well.  All told, the AMI BIOS used in the P4C800 is fairly feature rich but a little less user friendly than the IC7-G's Award BIOS with Abit's "Softmenu".  Additionally, those interested in extreme overclocking, may find themselves with out the needed voltage boost, above and beyond 1.7V.
  

Test Setup, Overclocking and Initial Numbers