Intel Showcases Dunnington, Nehalem and Larrabee Processors

Article Index:   

In an impromptu pre-IDF press briefing today, Intel disclosed a wealth of new information regarding its roadmap product efforts, upcoming multi-core processors and their associated platforms.  The discussion, chaired by the Senior VP of Intel's Digital Enterprise Group, Pat Gelsinger, even covered additional detail of the company's future play in the discrete GPU space, code-named Larrabee. 

Pat dove in quickly with what was probably Intel's most ambitious design effort yet, that will bear fruit some time in 2H '08, the new six-core infused Dunnington server/workstation processor.  

 
Intel Dunnington CPU architecture
Six cores and 16MB L3 cache

Some of the more interesting take-aways with Dunnignton were that Intel has re-tooled a shared L2/L3 cache architecture and that Dunnington will in fact be socket compatible with their current Caneland platform.  However, we would expect that actual drop-in compatibility is guaranteed only by system board manufacturers with capable power circuits and up to date BIOS microcodes.  Pat also stressed that Dunnington, though comprised of some 1.9 billion transistors and 16MB of L3 cache, will adhere to Intel's current power efficiency characteristics of their advanced 45nm Hi-K processing technology.  Several systems were referenced in a recent third-party SPECpower Energy Efficiency test, showing Intel's current leadership with the Xeon 5400 and 5300 series of products in the top ten slots currently in the industry.  

Next, Gelsinger stepped up with Intel's mainstream big gun, the company's forthcoming Nehalem quad core processor.  Nehalem is slated to be Intel's first mainstream desktop product with a direct-attached serial interface, dubbed QPI or QuickPath Interconnect, a monumental upgrade over their now seriously aging Front Side Bus architecture.

 
The Nehalem core CPU architecture
4 Cores, QuickPath Interconnect, integrated memory controller, eight threads 

Easily one the most interesting and talked-about aspects of Nehalem, Intel's new QuickPath Interconnect will provide for high speed, low latency transactions coming on and going off chip.  Previously, one way Intel was able to mitigate FSB latency and bus turn-around times, was with larger amounts of L2 cache that provided more on-chip memory resources and thus required fewer requests over the FSB and out to system memory.  Nehalem however, will have only 256K of L2 cache per core and a 8MB of L3 cache per chip.  Comparatively, AMD's future 45nm quad core Phenoms will have 512K of L2 cache per core and 6MB of L3 total.  Obviously Intel knows their architecture best but clearly this cache architecture seems a bit spartan versus previous Intel architectures, though admittedly exorbitant amounts of on-chip cache should no longer be a requirement with the new QPI interface at Nehalem's disposal. 

 
Intel Tylersburg Platform with DDR3, QPI and Gen2 PCI Express

And of course let's not forget the now fully integrated three channel DDR3 memory controller that Nehalem will bring with it to the platform. With support for three DIMMs per channel, total system memory densities can scale to a whopping 18GB of RAM total.  That ought to run Vista well enough we think.  The real key here for performance aficionados and high-end workstation types however, will be the lower overall latency and higher available bandwidth (up to ~ 32GB/sec)  with Nehalem's on-board memory controller.  We're anxious to see this in action.  Coupled with QPI, the chip should have ultra-low latency characteristics in many areas.  In addition, Nehalem's architecture will provide for two, four and octal-core designs with these easily configurable serial links.

In closing on the Nehalem processor itself, Gelsinger noted that Nehalem will also offer significantly improved multi-threaded performance, with up to a 33% improvement in available simultaneous micro-ops,  more efficient cache management and higher performance branch prediction, with an added second level branch predictor.  Finally Gelsinger noted that though Nehalem won't have any features on board formally known as Hyperthreading, he did note that per-core multithreaded performance will in fact be significantly improved over their Pentium 4 Netburst architecture.  

Intel noted that they expect Nehalem to ship sometime in Q4 '08 and their next generation Westmere and Sandy Bridge processors, based on 32nm die geometries, will be introduced in 2009 - 2010.  In addition, Intel will bring out a new instruction set with Sandy Bridge, branded "AVX" for Advanced Vector Extensions, that is aimed at beefing up SSE with 256-bit vector extensions for higher performance floating point calculations.  Next, Pat segued into new frontiers in what Intel calls "visual computing" or what the rest of the world knows now as 3D graphics.  More on this next...  

Image gallery

Related content

Comments

Comments
frg1 6 years ago

 i wonder how good of a gpu intel can make

peti1212 6 years ago

I wonder how fast would the 8-core or the 6-core processor render in a 3D application. :). It's time for intel to integrade a bit of a graphics power into their CPUs, because rendering times would be much better that way. Just take a look at 3DMark06, when the CPU test is going on and when the graphical tests, you see a big difference.

Anonymous 6 years ago

It really sucks that Dunnington is for servers only

AjayD 6 years ago
This is exactly the type of article I look forward to reading the most. Intel certainly has some promising technologies waiting to be deployed. With Larrabee on Intel's horizon, companies like AMD-ATI and NVIDIA really need to be on their toes so as not to get capsized by Intel's wake. It looks like the stage is set for serious developments in 3D graphics to finally begin.
frg1 6 years ago

 one good thing about intel getting into the graphics could possible be lower prices and newer gpus coming out alot more often

Kamrooz 6 years ago

[quote user="AjayD"]This is exactly the type of article I look forward to reading the most. Intel certainly has some promising technologies waiting to be deployed. With Larrabee on Intel's horizon, companies like AMD-ATI and NVIDIA really need to be on their toes so as not to get capsized by Intel's wake. It looks like the stage is set for serious developments in 3D graphics to finally begin.[/quote] 

I agree man ^_^...I've been waiting for the IDF for a while...Great to get information before hand =D.

I know Nehalem is going to be a monster, but I'm mostly curious on Larabee more than anything else...I really can't wait till 2009 to see a demonstration of what it's truly capable of =D. 

Anonymous 6 years ago

i do not put my hopes up that Larrabee will be better than a ATI/NV solution

Kamrooz 6 years ago

[quote user="CoolZone"]

i do not put my hopes up that Larrabee will be better than a ATI/NV solution

[/quote] 

They are compeltely different in the way they process...So I'm curious to see the performance. Although Larabee without a doubt will be better for ray tracing..Which I believe the future will be a mixture of Ray tracing and Rasterizing technologies...The future does indeed look bright atm =P. 

Post a Comment
or Register to comment